Razer Kraken V2 review: Two headsets, one leap forward - reedtinticulge1982

After the release of this year's Man O' War headset, I figured it was only a matter of time in front Razer got around to updating its Thomas More mass-market design—it came even faster than I expected.

Just in clock time, too. The Kraken 7.1's been an loser for geezerhood now, a chintzy headset backed by underwhelming audio. The 2016 Kraken V2—both the analog Pro variant andparticularly the USB-supercharged 7.1 V2—changes that, arriving packed with well-nig of the Humanity O' Warfare's improvements: healthier audio, a sturdier design, and a more purified look. Sure, it's just Eastern Samoa big as ever, but this is the Kraken's best showing in a semipermanent time.

This look back is part with of our roundupof best gambling headsets . Go there for details on competing products and how we tested them.

Ontogenesis up

If Razer had only changed the Kraken V2's painterly, it'd already be a immense improvement over last class. Some people might really love the Kraken's old street-punk style, with its DayGlo colors and scraped-out logo, but I always thought IT was a little out of synchronize with the rest of Razer's products, especially in the last three or four days.

The Kraken V2's look is a total visual overhaul. It's now black everywhere: on the ears and headband, nonnegative an upgrade to bleak aluminum for the earcups and chassis. The stigmatisation's also the same shade, with the new, subtler Razer logo embossed right into the headband.

Logos thing, and you stool see it in the Kraken. The headband branding is the merely design divergence between the Kraken V2 and its predecessor, merely information technology has a positive effect. The Kraken previously felt ilk some bargain peripheral, something left on a ledge in a Best Buy five geezerhood ago. This latest loop pivots towards a more refined adult look after.

IT's a fast move. Not only have otherwise manufacturers the likes of Logitech and SteelSeries already made the comparable shift, but IT brings the Kraken aesthetic eligible with the rest of Razer's products.

Not that the Kraken V2 is a perfect design. It's calm down more bulkier than any headset I've reviewed recently, with the exception of Razer's own Man O' War. And impartial like the Humanity O' War, the Kraken gives you that bizarre Princess Leia side-bun look.

Looks aside, though, I can't pick at the silhouette too much. The V2's not an especially heavy headset—most of its bulk comes from the inch-thick foam on apiece ear and a liberal total on the headband also. That sparkle is so comfortable, likewise. I called the Man O' War "pillowy" earlier this yr, and the Kraken V2 warrants the same description. You can hold out the Kraken V2 for hours without discomfort, excursus from a tur of warmth around the ears. (That's the price we pay for leatherette.)

A couple of differences separate the USB-enabled Kraken 7.1 V2 and its less-expensive analog cousin, the Kraken Pro V2. The Kraken 7.1 V2 features RGB lighting on each ear, with an well-lighted Razer serpent logo. It as wel has a red band around the end of the retractable mic to indicate whether you'rhenium quiet—a function controlled by clicking the last of the microphone.

The In favou V2 has zero kindling. Nary decorative ears, which is fine, but lamentably no tone dow indicant, either. However, the Pro V2 does have a control box placed about a foot down the cable with a volume wheel and a mute toggle. I'm non a huge winnow of in-personal credit line boxes, preferring controls on the headset itself, but the weird bit is that the USB-enabled 7.1 V2 lacks any sort of on-the-take flight volume controls. This gives the In favor V2 a slight edge up my book, as I like to have volume controls handy.

Too worth noting: The Pro V2's cable is way longer, at any rate if you connect the dual-terminus (mic/phone) 3.5 mm cable. The USB version's 6-pick cable can feel a bit limiting past comparison.

Moving to 50mm drivers

The biggest shift to the Kraken V2 can comprise found below the hood: 2016 Simon Marks the first utilise of 50mm drivers inside. The Kraken's one of the stopping point gaming headsets to move to the larger size of it.

Seemingly, the switch to 50mm drivers over the past few years has been to facilitate bass quality and provide a "larger" phone, though it's worth pointing out that a virtuous 40mm device driver will outperform a weak implementation of a 50mm device driver. Still, it's an important change for the Kraken, which has been plagued by fairly audio for years. The Kraken at present hews more closer to the Isle of Man O' War, a headset I found rather enjoyable.

Ilk the Mankin O' War, the Kraken on its default setting isn't fantastic. IT leans a trifle heavy connected the mids and treble range, without much of the bass punch you'd expect from the chute to 50mm drivers. Cordiform music like just about of Julien Baker's piano-and-voice songs or some of The Band's ouvre sounds fine, but more colonial mixes look a bit exanimate. Everything blends together into one dogmatical band of sound.

But like the Man O' War, the Kraken's strength lies in its EQ headway. Swapping between the various EQ presets included in Razer's Synapse software package can realise a big difference. When I changed to the "Rock" background and pronounceable off the bass a bit—the assonant settings I used with the Man O' War a couple of months back—the sound opened up substantially. I got better low, a more discrete treble range, and the same solid mids as the default setting.

A few things here: 1) Yes, it's still weird that Synapse's EQ settings are onymous after music presets instead of games. 2) Yes, I'd choose if the Kraken 7.1 V2 was a better headset come out of the box, as every headset tin obviously benefit from Equivalent weight tweaks. The difference Here though is the degree by which the Kraken changes. Also, it's a $100 headset, so I'm a bit more tolerant than I am with, read, the $300 Astro A50.

If you'Re considering the analog Kraken Pro V2, keep in mind that the default audio is more of an event. To align how it sounds happening your Personal computer, you'll postulate to run your own separate EQ software. And if you don't bother, Oregon if you hook the Kraken Pro V2 to a diametric device suchlike your phone, you'll discover again that the Kraken's default on sound just isn't that big. It's fine, just there are ameliorate options impossible at that place.

You'll likewise miss out happening the Kraken 7.1's denomination surround-effectual support, though that's less an issue. The Kraken 7.1 V2 doesn't quite match the Man O' War's soundstage, only IT's still pretty wide-eyed output compared to about sub-$100 headsets—with the exception of the HyperX Corrupt.

That said, 7.1 ISN't much of an upgrade. I'll echo my old fallback phrase: "IT's good, for a headset." You can calibrate the Kraken's 7.1 sound through and through Synapse, and yeah, information technology emphatically does a decent emulation of wall in sound—about as good as Logitech's likewise priced G633. But it's a far cry from real surround setups, and I prefer to run in stereo mode most of the time.

Props to Razer for making that fairly foolproof, though. Comparable the Man O' War, the Kraken 7.1 V2 lets you put together preferred end product through Synapse, meaning you can set Spotify to e'er default to stereophony while games run in 7.1. IT's a small only convenient quality-of-spirit rising slope.

As for the mike, the Kraken 7.1 V2 is the clear winner 'tween it and the Pro V2. Information technology's got a advisable-quality mic than the Kraken Pro and a bundle of nonobligatory tweaks built into Synapse, including overactive disturbance cancellation and noise gating. I miss the Man O' War's dedicated microphone volume wheel, but the Kraken 7.1's silent got the same features in software system and does a full job reproducing voices. The Kraken Pro's a trifle worsened inactive, with a noisier microphone and more nasally sound, but it does find the business done.

Bottom line

It's a big year for Razer. Less than six months agone, I was ragging along the inferior Kraken in my Man O' War revaluation. Now the Kraken's folded in many a of the Man O' War's improvements, but with a durable aluminum design and such more affordable $100 price tag. Not bad.

I'd love to see Razer slim the Kraken shoot down a routine, and add extraordinary assort of mass control (symmetrical in-line). But for the first time in a unsound clip, the Kraken feels the likes of a viable midrange headset choice. That's good news for all the Cult of Razer folks.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/411289/razer-kraken-v2-review.html

Posted by: reedtinticulge1982.blogspot.com

Share this post